Not everything is invalid, but everything can seem valid
In a previous post I mentioned that I had a theory that "everything is invalid". Now I realize that statement is not only false, but a misleading way to present the moral of the theory. Essentially, the theory goes that everything a person can possibly think or say can seemingly be justified with the right words. A part of me thought this invalidated everything that could be said; that even the theory invalidated itself. Now I realize that this is a glaring contradiction. However, I still think there's something to be drawn from the idea that anything a person can say may seem valid if explained the right way. This leads to the dangerous conclusion that anybody can be taken in by a thought, whether that thought is valid or not, hence the existence of conspiracy theorists like flat earthers. It's not just pathos either; dots can be connected and drawn in such elaborate ways between ideas that anything could seem logical even if it isn't. I know that I could do mor...